• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Benjamin Brown

Member
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I would be also interested. I have a few Malkin KHL cards that would be considered a pre-rookie I guess
  2. I cut some perforated cards and they were sent back ungraded. I have also sent some that were "pulled" apart and have had some graded/some not. Not sure the process they are using to determine eligibility.
  3. I have had a number of perforated cards come back as "evidence of trimming" or minimum size. I have also had a few grade as AU authentic. Some were precut. Others I tore/cut myself. There was no pattern to what they eventually graded vs sent back raw.
  4. If it was marked as received in the system then that is abnormal. If it was marked received to the facility as in delivered by Fedex/USPS then that sounds about right.
  5. When was it marked received? Bulk is around 6 months. For $12/card I don't know how anyone can be that upset or surprised in this current card climate.
  6. Awesome. I have a bulk marked 6/18. Hopefully leaves for me by the end of the week. Still in G/E/I
  7. What are you grading and at what tier? Certainly you will have issues if your sending in ultra modern. I have had no issue moving popular GOATS and vintage cards for competitive prices.
  8. I send my orders myself. I have sent 5 bulk orders. 1 completed and all marked received. I haven't had a hiccup to this point. Besides the TAT being a bit longer than I would have hoped I haven't had a bad experience yet.
  9. Idk....this sounds like a shipper issue not a CSG issue. I always buy my own insurance with FedEx.
  10. I just received my first bulk sub back marked received 5/17 shipped 9/3 One oddity I noticed is the use of thick holders for seemingly standard card thickness. Even found them mixed in for cards of the same set/year such as 1984 Topps Football. My walter peyton was in a thick holder while Elway/Marino were in standard slabs. Not really upset just odd
  11. They have been working on one for trading cards since rolling out grading services a little over a year ago. I imagine it will be the same system for sports cards. I wouldn't hold your breath. Probably another calendar year until we see something.
  12. There are a significant number of cards that simply do not populate in the search bar. Too many to list out here. The time it takes to manually enter a card makes larger submissions almost impossible. I have a 9-5. I can’t spend my next 3 evenings entering cards.